April, 2004
Notes
from Tom Eichler
The
Delaware General Assembly
is demonstrating a new and refreshing commitment to
getting smart on crime.
At the recently concluded budget hearings, the legislators probed
the courts and administrative agencies that were presenting their budget
requests. Their questions, which showed a heightened recognition that
Delaware’s criminal justice system needs reform, included:
-
Why do drug courts not have timely clinical assessments on treatment
needs at the time defendants are sentenced?
-
What is the Department of Health and Social Services doing to close
the drug treatment gap for low-income citizens before they are caught
up in the justice system?
-
How could the Department of Correction cover the release of 14,984
inmates last year with only $19,000 in "gate money" or $1.28 each?
-
Why does it take up to 12 months to process sentence modification
requests for inmates, costing the state $26,400 to incarcerate them
over that period of time?
-
Whatever happened with the June 2000 Correction Department master plan
recommendations to implement alternative management plans that could
save prison beds?
With many questions left unanswered, legislators
requested follow up replies from the agencies before them.
In the Senate, Senator McDowell
led the way in questioning a bill, requested by the Attorney General,
that would compromise a court decision that gives the News Journal
access to detailed criminal justice data through DELJIS, the
computerized criminal justice records. The bill, HB 319, would prevent
the release of information on the performance of police officers.
Ultimately, the bill was amended to protect individual officer names
(although they are all available in courthouse records), and the way
has been cleared for public analysis of the system.
SURJ asks: Why has the State itself not been doing this analysis all
along, rather than fighting an expensive six-year battle with the News
Journal, opposing and ultimately losing a case that would help inform
the public on the performance of our public servants in the delivery of
justice?
The General Assembly hit a high point the week
before it went into the Easter break when the Senate passed:
-
Senator Henry's bill, SB 56, to reduce the three-year
loss of driving privileges for a drug felony, making it possible to
get a conditional license after one year; and
-
Senator Peterson's bill, SB 229, removing the barrier
to more than 30 licensed professions and occupations for people who
have felony convictions.
In a spirited debate, Senators
challenged their colleagues to remove counterproductive barriers to
successful reentry of offenders to the community. They understood the
connection between access to jobs, including the ability to drive to
work, and the ability to stay crime free.
Kudos for Speaker Spence
too, who led the House in passing SURJ’s Special
Commission bill, HB 358. The bill would create a special commission to
conduct a comprehensive assessment of our criminal justice sentencing
and corrections policies and to make recommendations on alternatives
that will advance public safety without the need to more prisons.
We will keep you posted as each of these bills now
goes to the other house for consideration and let you know how you can
help in the 75 days remaining until the legislature’s June 30 recess.
Meanwhile, if you are in contact with your Representative or Senator,
please express your appreciation for the new focus that the General
Assembly is putting forth to "get smart" on crime.
National Report
and News Journal Target Barriers to Reentry
A New York Times April 6 editorial cited a
new study from the Legal Action Center, a criminal justice policy group,
identifying laws in all 50 states that hamper ex-offenders' ability to
re-enter society successfully.
The report notes driver’s license suspensions and
occupational license bans as significant barriers to reentry, which
supports recent passage of SB 56 and SB 229 in the Senate. SURJ hopes
the House will take note and pass the bills as well.
Meanwhile, in an editorial on April 14, the News
Journal lauded Senator Karen Peterson’s Senate Bill 229, saying that
the bill “offers a solution to job problems facing convicted felons
after their release,” and encouraging its passage.
|
Visions of Justice Forum Explores
Ex-Offender Employment

On
Friday, April 2, SURJ and the Delaware Center for Justice brought
together two experts on ex-offender employment, three of
Delaware's cabinet members, and over 100 members of the community at its
fifth Visions of Justice public forum.
Click below to more info and photos. More Details
Occupational Barriers to Reentry in Delaware
Delaware law prohibits ex-felons from obtaining
licenses to work in over 30 occupations. This means that if an
individual has ever been convicted of a felony, any felony, he or
she is no longer entitled to work as an:
- Athletic trainer
- Barber
- Clinical social worker
- Cosmetologist
- Electrician
- Landscape architect
- Plumber
Clearly, our laws are in need of reform, and this
is exactly what Senate Bill 229 would accomplish by removing the ban on
over 30 occupational licenses for ex-felons, requiring that a past
felony be directly related to an occupation, as determined by the
relevant state licensing board, to prohibit a license.
State Bar Endorses Repeal of Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences
On February 26, 2004, the Delaware State Bar
Association passed the following resolution, calling for the repeal of
mandatory minimum drug sentences:
“RESOLVED, that the Delaware State Bar Association, by and through its
Executive Committee, supports the elimination of mandatory minimum
sentences in the drug offense area thereby permitting Delaware’s trial
judiciary, once again, to exercise its discretion to impose the
appropriate sentence.”
SURJ 2003 Effort Recognized
Eyes and ears are turning toward SURJ in
recognition of our progress in advancing sentencing reform. A recent
News Journal editorial quoted Department of Correction Commissioner
Stanley Taylor as saying:
“For the first time in my career, the
[prison] population is reflecting a continuing negative trend.”
In a related News
Journal article and at our most recent
Visions of Justice forum, Commissioner Taylor made clear that he
credits this decrease to recent reforms, including the SURJ-endorsed
Senate Bill 50 on probation and House Bill 210,
a compromise drug sentencing reform bill that
SURJ played a key role in enacting in 2003.
A recent report by the VERA
Institute for Justice also recognized our accomplishments. |