| |
Substance Abuse Treatment March 2004
“Too many Americans in search of treatment cannot get it.”
- George W.
Bush, State of the Union Address, January 28, 2003
Delaware should capitalize on the potential
for substance abuse treatment to:
- Improve the lives of citizens.
- Increase public safety.
- Reduce future requirements for more expensive
prisons.
- In the community to get people off drugs before
they become caught up in the criminal justice system
- In the drug courts as an alternative path to
incarceration for non-violent offenders
- Within the prison system to break the drug habit
and prevent future recidivism
- According to the Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment, the average benefits of substance abuse treatment exceed
the costs by 3 to 1.
- A study that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of
publicly supported treatment programs in California concluded that
approximately $7 in future savings costs are being gained for every
dollar being spent on treatment programs in that state.
- Average illegal income in the year following
treatment was reduced by nearly two thirds among 11,750 clients
entering treatment for drug abuse in 41 programs throughout the United
States according to a national study. The study concluded treatment is
economically effective, because the cost of treatment was more than
recovered by the savings in crime reduction.
- The Department of Correction’s Key, Crest, and
aftercare treatment programs for offenders are research-proven and
nationally recognized.
"The Delaware
study shows that offenders receiving substance abuse treatment in a work
release setting spend 49 fewer days in reincarceration, compared to
those who only receive standard work release…”
-January 22, 2004 press
announcement of evaluation of Delaware’s Crest inmate work release
program made by Kathryn McCollister, Clifford Butzin, James Inciardi,
and Steven Martin.
Illicit Use of
Drugs is Widespread in Delaware
40.9% of White Delawareans and 39.5% of Non-White
Delawareans are estimated to have used illicit drugs at some time in
their life according to a survey performed for the State’s Division of
Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
26% of Delaware’s teenage student population used
marijuana during the previous month according to the Department of
Education’s 2001 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and 6% admitted ever using
cocaine at such a young age.
Such behavior places persons at health risk for
addiction and at risk of becoming a criminal justice statistic. Indeed,
arrest on a drug charge is often a “teachable moment” for illicit drug
users to decide to make a change…but is treatment available?
Among those incarcerated in Delaware, Correction
Commissioner Taylor has estimated that up to 80% have a treatable
substance abuse problem.
Treatment Gap Versus Shoveling Up
“There is no other medical condition for which we
would tolerate such huge numbers unable to obtain the treatment they
need.”
-Secretary Tommy G.
Thompson, U.S. Department of Health and Social Services DHSS News Release,
September 5, 2003
The 1999 DHSS report on alcohol and drug abuse in
the State of Delaware includes information on the need for treatment for
the general population (The Dimensions of Alcohol and Drug Abuse in
the Sate of Delaware, Robert A. Wilson, October 1999). Comparing
those in need of treatment against those who actually received treatment
the report indicates that:
- 1of 17.8 residents of Wilmington in need of
treatment received it; compared with
- 1 of 4.1 residents in New Castle County outside of
Wilmington;
- 1 of 8.8 residents in Kent County; and
- 1 of 8.9 residents in Sussex County.
The report goes on to indicate that:
- Approximately 50,000 Delawareans abuse alcohol or
drugs to the degree that they manifest the clinical criteria for abuse
or dependence;
- Less than 8,000 persons are treated for alcohol or
drug abuse during the average year;
- About 4,000 people are treated through the State
system;
- About 4,000 are treated through private or
voluntary programs;
- A conservative estimate is that about 25,000
people comprise the Delaware “treatment gap”. (p. 37)
The “gap” manifests itself in other ways as well:
- Delaware judges often sentence offenders to
incarceration because of their perception that prison-based treatment is
more certain than community-based services; and yet
- Of the 14,984 sentenced releases in 2003, the vast
majority received no drug treatment in spite of the fact that up to 80%
have an identified substance abuse need;
- Those sentenced to treatment at the work release
level (IV) often wait at the prison level (V) for an available treatment
slot to open.
In terms of priorities for the State’s substance
abuse expenditures according to a national study:
- 94 % goes for “shoveling up” the consequence of
substance abuse (prisons, health, welfare); but only
- 6 % is spent on prevention, treatment, research.
No Shortage of Recommendations for Improving Treatment for the
Offender Population
There is a gap in alternatives
to incarceration, primarily a lack of community-based substance abuse
and mental health treatment beds in Delaware. Because of these gaps in
community-based supervision options, the Court has little choice but to
use jail or prison for women offenders.
- Delaware Department of Correction
Female Offender Master Plan, April 1, 2000, p. 29.
Serious and thoughtful recommendations for
realizing substance abuse treatment as an alternative to ever-larger
Delaware prisons continue to be made. In addition to the many research
studies on effective treatment programs, those looking for solutions
need look no further than reports readily available:
- Department of Correction Male and Female
Offender Master Plans, April 2000 which include many treatment
recommendations for reducing prison demand;
- Sentencing Accountability Commission report
Sentencing Trends and Correctional Treatment in Delaware, April
2000. This national award-winning report documents the success of the
DOC Key and Crest programs and makes extensive recommendations for
further improvements;
- Substance Abuse Treatment Task Force Report
pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 4, March 2002, makes systematic
recommendations for improved treatment.
Substance Abuse Alternatives - Ten
Recommendations for Action In 2004
- Remove the “exclusion” from state employee health
insurance that voids coverage for substance abuse treatment when it is
“court directed” by any state court, including the drug court;
- Provide parity for substance abuse and mental
health coverage in insurance plans by implementing HB 100, and
specifically fund the cost of parity in employee health insurance
coverage;
- Pass the Governor’s Correction treatment budget
recommendations of $374,900 for drug treatment at the new Women’s Work
Release Center, and $500,000 for community corrections for drug
treatment for probationers (relieving need for incarceration to get
treatment);
- Pass SB 56 (Senators Henry, Blevins, Marshall,
Peterson, Amick, Bonini, Sorenson; Representatives Hudson, Keeley) to
reduce the loss of driving license for drug felony conviction from three
years to one year, facilitating access to treatment and employment;
- Resolve the pending funding crisis with the drug
court’s Treatment Access Committee (TASC) by the General Assembly’s
raising of court fines;
- Add performance measure (through Joint Finance
Committee action) for the TASC to provide court-ordered clinical
treatment assessments to the drug court judge prior to sentencing in 95%
of cases;
- Pass SB 136 (Senators Henry, Sokola, Sorenson;
Representatives George, Maier, Houghton, Viola) that would provide, on a
pilot basis, drug screening and treatment for low level drug offenders
taken into custody;
- Close the treatment gap for low income citizens
served by the Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health;
- Adopt (through DOC action) American Correctional
Association Standards for Therapeutic Communities to ensure that all
treatment community graduates in the Department of Correction (DOC)
receive transitional care and aftercare; and
- Authorize and resource the Delaware Statistical
Analysis Center (DelSAC) to annually report on recidivism of released
DOC offenders to monitor treatment and other programming effectiveness.
|