The News Journal Editorial
June 27, 2004
Legislature should give back judges' power to sentence
On the end of this session in Dover, the
General Assembly has an opportunity to undo a misguided and expensive
approach to criminal punishment. It should not waste this chance to
restore Delaware judges to their proper role.
Minimum mandatory sentencing gives prosecutors the role that belongs to
judges, and takes away judges' discretion to deal with defendants. These
laws reduce judges to trial administrators.
Minimum mandatory sentencing arose in the 1970s in reaction to illegal
drugs and violent crimes and the perception that judges were lenient
with offenders. Legislators saw it as their responsibility to limit
judges' ability to pronounce sentences.
This often meant that a first-time offender in possession of a paltry
amount of illegal drugs was deemed a dealer and sent to prison for
years. In reality, most such offenders were not dealers but had drugs
they planned to use themselves. Of course, that's wrong but not always
worth hard prison time. Home confinement, community service and drug
rehabilitation may make more sense in personal, social and financial
terms.
Lock up violent offenders
It costs about $25,000 a year to keep an inmate in prison in Delaware.
That money should be spent to keep murderers, rapists and armed robbers
locked up, not minor first-time drug offenders.
Minimum mandatory sentences has led to prison overcrowding, which is
expensive on several levels. Bigger prisons and more corrections
officers are needed. Warehousing prisoners means fewer drug
rehabilitation and educational programs on the inside. When prisons are
not humane, expensive lawsuits result and the state is forced to either
build new facilities or let offenders out early.
The shortcomings of minimum mandatory sentencing has been recognized by
local reform groups like Stand Up for What's Right and Just and
prestigious national organizations like the American Bar Association.
Last week, an ABA commission urged an end to minimum mandatory sentences
in the United States. It characterized most such sentences as unfair and
noted that many get-tough approaches to crime don't work. There's no
evidence these laws make society safer.
Delaware judges are considered among the best in the country. Why then
do legislators forbid them to make informed decisions in criminal
justice matters.
House Bill 517, to repeal all minimum mandatory drug sentences, was
introduced in the General Assembly last week. It is the perfect
opportunity to restore fiscal intelligence and fairness.
|